본문내용 바로가기 메인메뉴 바로가기 서브메뉴 바로가기
홈연구정보연구보고서기본연구

기본연구

공공누리이미지

한국해양수산개발원 연구발간물 보호 저작물은 '공공누리' 출처 표시, 상업적 이용금지, 변경금지 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다.

기본연구 상세보기
APEC 수산분야 조기자유화의 영향과 대책
구분 기본1998-15 발간일 1998-12-01
공공누리 제 4유형 연구책임자 신영태
전문

APEC EVSL was scheduled to implement 9 sectors including fish and fish products since 1999. However, as APEC failed to reach the agreement for EVSL, this project will be continuously discussed at WTO. While the EVSL is supposed to have positive effects on the national economy, it may have significant negative effects on producer`s profit. That is, it may cause a sharp drop in the producers` surplus in the fishery industry. If the negative effects continue for a long time, it causes the sharp drop in the number of fishermen and finally it leads to the contraction of the fishery industry.

Therefore, this paper attempts to analyze both effects (positive and negative), and suggests that some commodities be excluded from EVSL, which was adopted as a formal policy direction by the Korean government. Furthermore, this paper also suggests some policy directions to minimize negative effects based on the results of this study. These are, for example, the establishment of negotiation strategies for future agreement, import management and export promotion strategies for fish products, the mechanization and modernization of fishing gear, the buy back of fishery licenses, etc.

기본연구 상세보기
APEC 수산분야 조기자유화의 영향과 대책
구분 기본1998-15 발간일 1998-12-01
공공누리 제 4유형 연구책임자 신영태
전문

APEC EVSL was scheduled to implement 9 sectors including fish and fish products since 1999. However, as APEC failed to reach the agreement for EVSL, this project will be continuously discussed at WTO. While the EVSL is supposed to have positive effects on the national economy, it may have significant negative effects on producer`s profit. That is, it may cause a sharp drop in the producers` surplus in the fishery industry. If the negative effects continue for a long time, it causes the sharp drop in the number of fishermen and finally it leads to the contraction of the fishery industry.

Therefore, this paper attempts to analyze both effects (positive and negative), and suggests that some commodities be excluded from EVSL, which was adopted as a formal policy direction by the Korean government. Furthermore, this paper also suggests some policy directions to minimize negative effects based on the results of this study. These are, for example, the establishment of negotiation strategies for future agreement, import management and export promotion strategies for fish products, the mechanization and modernization of fishing gear, the buy back of fishery licenses, etc.

이전글, 다음글 읽기
이전글 책임있는 어업의 국내실증연구 : OECD 어업규범화에 대비하여
다음글 장보고 해상활동의 재조명과 21세기 해양사상 고취방향