한국해양수산개발원 연구발간물 보호 저작물은 '공공누리' 출처 표시, 변경금지 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다.
韓·中·日 漁業協定 對策樹立에 관한 硏究 | |||
---|---|---|---|
구분 | 기본1999-16 | 발간일 | 1999-12-31 |
공공누리 | 제 3유형 | 연구책임자 | 박성쾌 |
전문 | |||
There are ten types of offshore and three types of deep-sea fisheries among the fishery activities affected by the fisheries agreements between Korea and Japan or Korea and China. It has been verified that the amount of catch by domestic vessels in the subject area of the fisheries negotiation between Japan and China is about 313 thousand M/T.
It has been estimated that the fisheries agreement between Korea and Japan reduced fishery production by 145.4∼215.7 billion won and profit by 27.1∼37.1 billion won, and that the agreement between Korea and China cut down 53.6∼148.2 billion won and 9.8∼28.1 billion won of each. The number of fishing vessels reduced caused by the Korea-Japan agreement was assessed as 944∼1,396 boats, and the Korea-China agreement as 393∼666 boats. The unemployment which resulted from the Korea-Japan agreement was approximately 10,225∼15,341 persons, and 3,829∼6,535 persons by the Korea-China fisheries agreement. Also, the unemployment allowance was estimated as 42.5∼55 billion won and 17∼29.1 billion won respectively. And finally, the estimation of sales reduction of the industries concerned was 120.1∼210.1 billion won and 60∼118.6 billion won by the respective agreements. In order to accommodate the negative effects of the fisheries agreements in the short term, it is required to support the fisheries as well as the related industries under the special law, and to impose strict regulations on new entries into offshore fisheries. In the long term, it is necessary to establish a new fisheries management policy which can respond to the new fisheries regime in the east Asia. The new fisheries policy is, for example, restructuring fisheries sector, taking into account the status of resources, reduced fishing grounds and business situation. At the same time, it is necessary to divide the Korean EEZ into coastal and offshore zones and make clear the objective, means, and principal manager of each marine zone. |
韓·中·日 漁業協定 對策樹立에 관한 硏究 | |||
---|---|---|---|
구분 | 기본1999-16 | 발간일 | 1999-12-31 |
공공누리 | 제 3유형 | 연구책임자 | 박성쾌 |
전문 | |||
There are ten types of offshore and three types of deep-sea fisheries among the fishery activities affected by the fisheries agreements between Korea and Japan or Korea and China. It has been verified that the amount of catch by domestic vessels in the subject area of the fisheries negotiation between Japan and China is about 313 thousand M/T.
It has been estimated that the fisheries agreement between Korea and Japan reduced fishery production by 145.4∼215.7 billion won and profit by 27.1∼37.1 billion won, and that the agreement between Korea and China cut down 53.6∼148.2 billion won and 9.8∼28.1 billion won of each. The number of fishing vessels reduced caused by the Korea-Japan agreement was assessed as 944∼1,396 boats, and the Korea-China agreement as 393∼666 boats. The unemployment which resulted from the Korea-Japan agreement was approximately 10,225∼15,341 persons, and 3,829∼6,535 persons by the Korea-China fisheries agreement. Also, the unemployment allowance was estimated as 42.5∼55 billion won and 17∼29.1 billion won respectively. And finally, the estimation of sales reduction of the industries concerned was 120.1∼210.1 billion won and 60∼118.6 billion won by the respective agreements. In order to accommodate the negative effects of the fisheries agreements in the short term, it is required to support the fisheries as well as the related industries under the special law, and to impose strict regulations on new entries into offshore fisheries. In the long term, it is necessary to establish a new fisheries management policy which can respond to the new fisheries regime in the east Asia. The new fisheries policy is, for example, restructuring fisheries sector, taking into account the status of resources, reduced fishing grounds and business situation. At the same time, it is necessary to divide the Korean EEZ into coastal and offshore zones and make clear the objective, means, and principal manager of each marine zone. |
|||
|
이전글 | 양식수산물에 대한 소비습관 및 수요분석 |
다음글 | 해양생명공학 육성 정책방향 연구 |